To summarize, MIM shares the dependency-inversion concept with Clean/Hexagonal/Onion Architectures. But MIM also proposes approaches that can be applied to the gray areas in the overall design process developers need to address to complete the project. Also this application architecture is less prescriptive, thus more universal. Of course, there are many successful projects with e.g. Hexagonal or Clean/Onion Architectures, but in most cases I’ve seen the designers had to first address the ambiguities and unanswered questions themselves in order to succeed. For small projects, a design typical of Hexagonal Architecture (or maybe even Clean Architecture) might be better. At least as long as it stays small.
ВСУ запустили «Фламинго» вглубь России. В Москве заявили, что это британские ракеты с украинскими шильдиками16:45
。heLLoword翻译官方下载对此有专业解读
Portable, leverages C compiler's optimizer, but indirection
尹 계엄 직후보다 낮은 국힘 지지율… 중도층서 9%로 역대 최저
Enjoying this piece? Get the Binary Log Newsletter - deep dives, broad explorations and distilled insights. For curious developers driven to master the craft: